Thanks, I don't know how to go about doing that, so I would have to rely on
others wanting to help me if they consider this to be also useful to them
(which I definitely think it is!).

El mar., 17 nov. 2020 a las 11:32, Ihor Radchenko (<yanta...@gmail.com>)
escribió:

> > I actually now realized that your function will not unfortunately archive
> > each logged item (those located in the logbook) in its corresponding date
> > (!).
> > What it will do is to archive the whole tree under today's date without
> > deleting it from the original org file.
>
> You are right. It is expected behaviour. That's why I suggested to run
> it in org-trigger-hook, which will trigger at the day and time when you
> mark the task DONE.
>
> Best,
> Ihor
>
> Gerardo Moro <gerardomor...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Hi again,
> >
> > I actually now realized that your function will not unfortunately archive
> > each logged item (those located in the logbook) in its corresponding date
> > (!).
> > What it will do is to archive the whole tree under today's date without
> > deleting it from the original org file.
> >
> > For instance,
> >
> > * TODO REPEATED TASK SAMPLE
> >   SCHEDULED: <2020-11-30 Mon +20d>
> >   :PROPERTIES:
> >   :STYLE:    habit
> >   :LAST_REPEAT: [2020-11-09 Mon 22:28]
> >   :END:
> > :LOGBOOK:
> > - State "DONE"       from "TODO"       [2020-11-15 Sun 22:28]
> > - State "DONE"       from "STARTED"    [2020-11-14 Sat 22:17]
> > - State "DONE"       from "STARTED"    [2020-11-13 Fri 22:17]
> > - State "DONE"       from "STARTED"    [2020-11-11 Wed 22:17]
> >
> > If I position myself in any point in this entry, when I execute the
> > function it will archive the whole tree+subtree under today's date (the
> > date when it was archived).
> > The behaviour I was expecting is to archive each of the logged tasks
> under
> > their corresponding date (on the 11th, 13th, 14th and 15th of November).
> > Just to be clear :)
> > G
> >
> > El lun., 16 nov. 2020 a las 17:21, Gerardo Moro (<
> gerardomor...@gmail.com>)
> > escribió:
> >
>

Reply via email to