On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 12:59 PM Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
> "Bruce D'Arcus" <bdar...@gmail.com> writes: ... > > I guess the question at this stage is how to iterate this. > > > > I already added a change or two based on feedback from Joost, and it > > does make sense to add a new column for latex. > > > > It seems easier to me to do it on the wiki, rather than post a new > > version to the list every time, in part because it allows others to > > edit it. > > > > Any thoughts Nicolas? > > Is the default \cite{key} command (without any other package) used? I'm > not sure we should provide it since we are working towards more complete > solutions. Not ATM. The table only has suggested mappings for natbib, biblatex, and citeproc-el/org, though Eric was wondering about adding also one for standard latex. > I'd like to give a shot at "oc-natbib.el" in a few hours. It may give an > incentive to start out "oc-biblatex.el" (which is a bit harder). > > AFAIU, the idea is to use styles from you wiki. However, sub-styles are > not mentioned. I just have the note they are a good idea, but wasn't sure on details. > They could be "full" for the starred variants, "caps" for > the capitalized ones, and "alt" for those without parenthesis, so one > could write: > > [cite/text/alt/full/caps:...] (in any order) > > and obtain > > \Citealt*{...} I'll add them to the wiki page. It did occur to me that ideally users could customize what the default command is. My choices for natbib and biblatex defaults are I think defensible, but some may disagree. Bruce