"Bruce D'Arcus" <bdar...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 12:59 PM Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> > wrote:
>> Is the default \cite{key} command (without any other package) used? I'm >> not sure we should provide it since we are working towards more complete >> solutions. > > Not ATM. > > The table only has suggested mappings for natbib, biblatex, and > citeproc-el/org, though Eric was wondering about adding also one for > standard latex. I meant: is it useful to even mention it? Is it used at all when other more complete solutions exist? >> AFAIU, the idea is to use styles from you wiki. However, sub-styles are >> not mentioned. > > I just have the note they are a good idea, but wasn't sure on details. OK. Let's go for the verbose path. >> They could be "full" for the starred variants, "caps" for >> the capitalized ones, and "alt" for those without parenthesis, so one >> could write: >> >> [cite/text/alt/full/caps:...] (in any order) >> >> and obtain >> >> \Citealt*{...} > > I'll add them to the wiki page. > > It did occur to me that ideally users could customize what the default > command is. My choices for natbib and biblatex defaults are I think > defensible, but some may disagree. Customizing default command is the point of the third parameter in "cite_export" keyword. When using: #+cite_export: natbib harvard text [cite:...] is equivalent to [cite/text: ...] So the processor must choose a default value, but the user may choose another one. Regards,