"Bruce D'Arcus" <bdar...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 12:59 PM Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
> wrote:
>> Is the default \cite{key} command (without any other package) used? I'm
>> not sure we should provide it since we are working towards more complete
>> solutions.
>
> Not ATM.
>
> The table only has suggested mappings for natbib, biblatex, and
> citeproc-el/org, though Eric was wondering about adding also one for
> standard latex.
I meant: is it useful to even mention it? Is it used at all when other
more complete solutions exist?
>> AFAIU, the idea is to use styles from you wiki. However, sub-styles are
>> not mentioned.
>
> I just have the note they are a good idea, but wasn't sure on details.
OK. Let's go for the verbose path.
>> They could be "full" for the starred variants, "caps" for
>> the capitalized ones, and "alt" for those without parenthesis, so one
>> could write:
>>
>> [cite/text/alt/full/caps:...] (in any order)
>>
>> and obtain
>>
>> \Citealt*{...}
>
> I'll add them to the wiki page.
>
> It did occur to me that ideally users could customize what the default
> command is. My choices for natbib and biblatex defaults are I think
> defensible, but some may disagree.
Customizing default command is the point of the third parameter in
"cite_export" keyword.
When using:
#+cite_export: natbib harvard text
[cite:...] is equivalent to [cite/text: ...]
So the processor must choose a default value, but the user may choose
another one.
Regards,
