On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 3:36 AM Denis Maier <denis.maier.li...@mailbox.org> wrote:
> Bruce has sent me his test files, and it turned out to be the bibstyle > (humannat), which apparently isn't included in current tex distributions. > Question: I can't see why this style should be used according to the > minimal example Bruce has shared. Is this style added as the default > style by the exporter? Or did you, Bruce, specify it somewhere? If I add plainnat as style to the org file, I still get the undefined citation error. Here's the current file: [cite/text/alt:see ;@einstein] [cite//alt/caps:@einstein] [cite//full:@einstein] [cite//caps:@einstein] #+cite_export: natbib plainnat #+bibliography: test.bib
