Hello,
"Bruce D'Arcus" <bdar...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 2:08 PM Bruce D'Arcus <bdar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I did some basic testing, and it seems to work well in general ...
>
> That was just looking at the citation output, of course.
>
> Now I did the real test: would LaTeX -> PDF work.
>
> Answer: not ATM.
>
> Here's my minimal document:
>
> ----
> [cite/text/alt:see ;@mann-68]
>
> [cite//alt/caps:@mann-68]
>
> [cite//full:@mann-68]
>
> [cite//caps:@mann-68]
>
> #+cite_export: natbib
>
> #+bibliography: test.bib
> ----
>
> ... but when I run the export, I get an "undefined citation" error.
>
> The key is correct, as is the file name, which is in the same directly
> as the test file.
>
> What am I missing?
Your document doesn't contain a "#+print_bibliography" keyword. It is
responsible for adding the "\\bibliography{...}" macro. I don't think it
is possible to produce a PDF without it.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
