Max Nikulin <maniku...@gmail.com> writes: > I like Timothy's idea that \[ \] markup should behave like > block-level element rather than inline object.
On the other hand, we will loose the ability to inline small parts of math, that should be typeset as separate equation, like: ...text \[ 1+2=3 \] more text... I'm quite undecided in this regard. Personally, in almost all cases I try to let my equations stand out even in the source (Org or LaTeX), so I mostly use the "\begin{equation*}...\end{equation*}" variant. At least, Nicolas convinced me, that comparing to LaTeX does not help much (how LaTeX treats \[...\] is independent from how we want to structure Org documents). BTW: In LaTeX, I like to make equations stand out even further like this: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Some text % \begin{equation*} ... \end{equation*} % more text --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Is there a simple way to achieve this in Org (without using ugly solutions like "@@latex:%@@" - something concise, at most 2-3 chars, better only 1, but still visible in order to distinguish between compound block belonging to a single paragraph and separate paragraphs)? -- Until the next mail..., Stefan.