Karl Fogel <kfo...@red-bean.com> writes: >>Could you prepare a patch? Having a patch may encourage more >>feedback. > > Sure; please see attached.
Thanks! Marking your message as a patch to be tracked at updates.orgmode.org > From bb229b4f8f78ae52962d7bc90c8b1d4993af8263 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Karl Fogel <kfo...@red-bean.com> > Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 19:02:38 -0500 > Subject: [PATCH] Mark function obsolete & fix spelling of its name This commit message is a bit confusing. I would mention the function name: "Mark `org-truely-invisible-p' obsolete and fix spelling of its name" > * lisp/org-macs.el (org-truely-invisible-p): Move to... > * lisp/org-compat.el (org-truly-invisible-p): ...here, and add... > (org-truely-invisible-p): ...this compatibility alias. It is too much. We can either 1. Obsolete org-truely-invisible-p. Then, there is not much point renaming it. 2. Rename it without obsoletion. Then, there is not much point moving the function definition to org-compat. > From: Ihor Radchenko > Subject: Re: Removing obsolete function `org-truely-invisible-p'. > To: Karl Fogel > Cc: Org Mode > Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 17:14:32 +0800 > Message-ID: <87h7b5rm6f.fsf@localhost> I usually just leave an ML link in such cases: https://orgmode.org/list/87h7b5rm6f.fsf@localhost Best, Ihor