Would you find it suitable to use [cite/command:pre @key post] in general? For portability, I suppose there could be a defcustom mapping if one wanted to leverage the oc-csl library with pretty minimal effort.
I think two things need to be addressed to fix that. First is allowing a * in the style/variant section; there are probably 17 or so of these commands in natbib/biblatex. Second is fixing org-activate-link so that link activation functions don't get called on something like [cite/citet:@key]. This is necessary for org-ref and org-cite to co-exist, but also other packages or users might also define links like cite:. John ----------------------------------- Professor John Kitchin (he/him/his) Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 @johnkitchin http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 11:56 AM Bruce D'Arcus <bdar...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 5:07 PM John Kitchin <jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu> > wrote: > > > > I was looking into using latex commands as styles in org-cite, e.g. > > > > [cite/citet:@key]. That example works fine, but [cite/citet*:@key] is > not allowed. Could that be allowed? > > I have no insight into the restriction, but I hope it can be removed. > > It occurs to me in that scenario it should be easy to write a function > that allows users to toggle between the two sets of styles: the direct > latex ones, and the more general default org-cite ones. > > Bruce >
