"Bruce D'Arcus" <bdar...@gmail.com> writes: >> A less awkward solution (IMO) would be to use an entity like ⋆. It is >> straightforward to add that to the org-element-citation-prefix-re. Then I >> see something like this. > > So Ihor, is there any problem with John's proposed change here?
I am not a big fan of using unicode characters, but otherwise I have no objections and no better ideas (except a general desire to solve similar parser issues more generally). However, I am not org-cite's maintainer. So, I would prefer to hear from Nicolas before implementing anything myself. Best, Ihor
