Hi Tim, thanks for reminding me the context.
Tim Cross <theophil...@gmail.com> writes: > Therefore, I think the position should be that once an emacs version is > no longer one of the supported versions (current stable Emacs release > plus two previous major versions), there is no guarantee we will inform > the list when compatibility is lost. Yes, fully agreed. If my previous message was unclear: it is *good* to inform the list of any compatibility issue (with any Emacsen), but we cannot promise we will warn the list for every breakage as we don't test Org with Emacs <=25. > If you are running an unsupported > versions, either you should avoid updates or be prepared for breakage > without warning. When we do know a commit has broken compatibility, that > information will be relayed to the list, but we cannot guarantee we can > provide such information at the time the change is committed. Running an > unsupported versions is at your own risk. Yes, thanks for articulating this very clearly. -- Bastien
