Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features"

[No Wayman]

Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes:

I am looking at the concept again, and I feel that we may be missing some flexibility here. I do not like the fact that each feature can only

have a simple implementation within specific backend.

Agreed

What I have in mind is an ability to parametrize the transcoders

This seems like a step in the right direction.