I totally agree with Max Nikulin: wouldn't that be an improvement? That would make things a lot easier for those instances in which you want to put the footnotes back in.
> Il giorno 3 mar 2023, alle ore 17:47, Max Nikulin <maniku...@gmail.com> ha > scritto: > > On 03/03/2023 22:47, Ihor Radchenko wrote: >> Max Nikulin writes: >>> Self-containing example: >>> >>> ---- 8< ---- >>> #+options: f:nil >>> >>> Pellentesque dapibus suscipit ligula.[fn::1 ftnt] Donec posuere augue >>> in quam. >>> ---- >8 ---- >> This is because spaces after Org syntax objects are considered a part of >> those syntax objects. So, excluding footnote automatically means >> excluding spaces after. > > In my opinion, the filter removing footnotes should transfer afterspaces to > preceding objects. >
