Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes: > Bastien Guerry <b...@gnu.org> writes: > >>> are there reasons not to punt the orphanage issue to this emacs >>> orphanage (and, point to it from the org wiki)? on the one hand, "less >>> control". on the other, "less work" (even "globally", if things scale). >> >> Indeed, perhaps https://github.com/emacsorphanage is a good shelter >> for Org orphan packages already. > > It is a good shelter, but I was hoping to promote Sourcehut and > discourage people using Github to report issues in favour of Org mailing > list. > > Otherwise, I have no objections to Jonas Bernoulli doing the background > maintenance. Less work for us at the end. > > One thing we may do though is letting him know about > https://orgmode.org/worg/org-orphanage.html - he may contact us or use > GitHub mentions, and he may let us know when a new Org-related package > lands on his repo.
Adding Jonas to the loop. For some more context, we are willing to help maintaining orphan Org-related packages if the requests are submitted to Org mailing list. The orphaned packages are accumulated at https://orgmode.org/worg/org-orphanage.html, which is also referenced in our call for contributors at https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html This discussion: https://list.orgmode.org/874jusk9gg.fsf@localhost/ -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
