On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 11:44:29AM +0000, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Bastien Guerry <b...@gnu.org> writes: > > >> ************************* TODO Consider explaining more about X > >> <paragraph N> > >> > >> <...> > >> > >> Then, I can easily review the manuscript status using sparse tree or > >> agenda view. > > > > I see -- but what is the real benefit of inline tasks here over normal > > tasks? I understand that <paragraph N> should not be considered as > > the details for a task, but rather its "target", but inline task does > > not seem to add much here. > > The benefit is that I do not need to search for that "paragraph N" when > I want to work on the task. I simply jump to the task location and can > immediately see the paragraph it refers to. > > Also, pdf export of such inlinetask will nicely mark the TODO item in > the manuscript draft, so that I can print things, and still see what > should be done in that particular location of the manuscript.
Interesting. I often will use comments when I need to update things in a document to be exported. * Item Wubba lubba ding dong. # TODO fix this to pig latin Arff!! * Other stuff Doesn't this really come down to a use case for having headings which are excluded from operations like comments are? Could we treat #'s as inline headings? Not sure how that'd handle drawers. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Russell Adams rlad...@adamsinfoserv.com https://www.adamsinfoserv.com/