On 2023-11-10, 09:26 +0000, Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> wrote: > What about the attached patch?
Hi Ihor, Brilliant. I think the second branch should read `(not (file-remote-p file))', i.e. `file' instead of `associated'? It seems to work with that micro amendment. Anything else I should be testing or does this look reasonable enough to be pushed to the repo at some point? Thank you very much for this! 🙏🙏🙏 Cheers, Fabio.
