On 2023-11-10, 11:13 +0000, Fabio Natali <m...@fabionatali.com> wrote: > Brilliant. I think the second branch should read `(not (file-remote-p > file))', i.e. `file' instead of `associated'? It seems to work with that > micro amendment.
Hm, I stand corrected, I retested it end-to-end and no, it doesn't seem to work. I'll post more details later. Cheers, Fabio.
