To continue... my first reaction to the bug was to
(setq org-beamer-frame-environment "frame")
to test. That resulted in
\newenvironment<>{frame}[1][]{\begin{frame}[environment=frame,#1]}{\end{frame}}
which is somehow weird and wrong.This is why I propose to wrap the code in an (unless (string= org-beamer-frame-environment "frame") ... ) so we are protected against people like me ;-) Best, /PA On Sat, 2 Mar 2024 at 07:24, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez < paag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Leo, > > Wouldn't it be wiser to combine you fix with mine. I still think that > setting org-beamer-frame-environment to "frame" when you don't need the fix > and not emitting the extra newenvironment code in that case makes the > generated LaTeX easier to read. Whether the default value should be frame > org or orgframe is something we can debate. > > Best, /PA > > On Sat, 2 Mar 2024 at 00:12, Leo Butler <leo.but...@umanitoba.ca> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Thanks for the bug report. The definition of the orgframe environment >> did not pass the overlay spec to the underlying frame environment. I >> believe the attached patch fixes that. >> >> Attached is an org file that appears to exercise the patch and show that >> it is doing the right thing. Could you confirm this, please? >> >> ---- >> Incidentally, I did propose that we introduce a BEAMER_FRAME property so >> that it could be manually set, but Ihor did not like that idea so it got >> scrapped. >> >> Thanks, >> Leo >> >> > > -- > Fragen sind nicht da, um beantwortet zu werden, > Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden > Georg Kreisler > > Headaches with a Juju log: > unit-basic-16: 09:17:36 WARNING juju.worker.uniter.operation we should run > a leader-deposed hook here, but we can't yet > > -- Fragen sind nicht da, um beantwortet zu werden, Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden Georg Kreisler Headaches with a Juju log: unit-basic-16: 09:17:36 WARNING juju.worker.uniter.operation we should run a leader-deposed hook here, but we can't yet
