Philip Kaludercic <[email protected]> writes: >>> We'd also prefer a more common format, e.g. xz instead of lzip (which >>> isn't supported by our standard unpacker), but this is a minor issue. > > This might also be difficult due to storage issues.
Here's a comparison of disk space usage of all latest packages from ELPA compressed by xz -9 and lzip -9 (note that xz was also significantly faster): /tmp/h$ du -s xz lzip 69460 xz 69168 lzip -- Arsen Arsenović
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
