>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2025, Arsen Arsenović wrote: > Stefan Monnier <[email protected]> writes: >>> Considering the above, I am inclined to agree. But I think the question >>> remains why we wouldn't want to provide a .lz'ed archive for the newest >>> release of a package? >> >> There's no reason not to other than the fact that the code currently >> doesn't do it.
> Can I ask for it to be done, then? This'd save me some effort and > enable more transparency when updating Elisp packages in Gentoo :-) +1 Also change to xz (instead of, or in addtion to lzip) if it's not too much of an effort.
