Isn't what I propose much cleaner and closer to LaTeX CBP? On Sat, 7 Feb 2026 at 16:46, Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> wrote:
> Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <[email protected]> writes: > > > Have tried what you suggest with little success. > > For example in the case of beamer, I tried adding > > \usepackage[dvipsnames]{xcolor} > > with a #+LATEX_HEADER and it did not work. > > That's expected, I think. beamer loads xcolor. > > > On the other hand I don't always need the dvips colour names always, > > so it would be doing and undoing the LaTeX class definition continuously, > > which is sort of a hassle. > > This way, I can add it when I need it and use just one LATEX_CLASS. > > IMHO it is much cleaner... > > What I meant is allowing something like > #+LATEX_CLASS_HEADER: \PassOptionsToPackage{dvipsnames}{xcolor} > #+LATEX_CLASS_HEADER: [HEADER] > > to augment the class definition. > (The above is looks clumsy though) > > -- > Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, > Org mode maintainer, > Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. > Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, > or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92> > -- Fragen sind nicht da, um beantwortet zu werden, Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden Georg Kreisler "Sagen's Paradeiser" (ORF: Als Radiohören gefährlich war) => write BE! Year 2 of the New Koprocracy
