Reza Housseini <[email protected]> writes:
> Thanks for your effort! I am not familiar with org-mode intrinsics, > thats why I can not really review your patch. That's fine. The maintainer will get around to it at some point. Meanwhile we can discuss it from a user perspective. > Regarding the update of the dynamic block, I guess it makes sense to > opt-out of this behavior via a flag if you don't want changed and > unsaved buffers? Yes, and maybe even an opt-in. Maybe it should be a new Babel header, like `:update-dblocks (yes|no|query)'. On the other hand, for this to cause any concerns, the user needs to reference a dynamic block in Babel in the first place. This apparently has not been a much-requested feature, so it's unlikely to trip many people up. It might even be enough to put a warning in the docs. Regards, Christian
