Christian Moe <[email protected]> writes: > Reza Housseini <[email protected]> writes: > >> Thanks for your effort! I am not familiar with org-mode intrinsics, >> thats why I can not really review your patch. > > That's fine. The maintainer will get around to it at some point. > Meanwhile we can discuss it from a user perspective. > >> Regarding the update of the dynamic block, I guess it makes sense to >> opt-out of this behavior via a flag if you don't want changed and >> unsaved buffers? > > Yes, and maybe even an opt-in. Maybe it should be a new Babel header, > like `:update-dblocks (yes|no|query)'. On the other hand, for this to > cause any concerns, the user needs to reference a dynamic block in Babel > in the first place. This apparently has not been a much-requested > feature, so it's unlikely to trip many people up. It might even be > enough to put a warning in the docs.
Yes maybe a warning is fine and we will see if we get any reactions from the user after implementation and could then readjust. > > Regards, > Christian
