Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> writes:

>> However, I agree that the above is more readable, and personally, I'm
>> fine with the risk of a few false negatives.
>
> I also agree that it is more readable.

Should BARK implement this?

Although it is not directly clickable, users can still copy and paste
the URL into their browser.

-- 
 Bastien

Reply via email to