[திங்கள் ஏப்ரல் 27, 2026] Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Visuwesh <[email protected]> writes: > >> Since my name was mentioned in the email, I feel that it is only fair >> that I reply. The reason for my lack of responses to the emails from >> this mailing list have been mainly two-fold (sorry!): a general lack of >> interest in Org mode sprung from my dwindling use of it, and a long >> commute to work killing my spare time and energy. Fortunately, the >> latter is taken care of, but I don't see foresee my interest in Org mode >> rekindling any time soon. If it does, I would be happy to volunteer in >> my capacity. (I barely even hack on Emacs anymore, mostly use it to get >> work done nowadays which is telling...) > > Note that you were mentioned in the context of your existing contributions. > It does not matter whether you are still interested in Org personally or > not. You already did valuable work for the community, including > implementing new features and fixing bugs. I would like to thank you > again for that. > > Also, just to be 100% clear, I did not mention you to ask you > specifically to volunteer for anything or reply to emails you think you > should have replied. That's completely up to you. The fact that you > contributed significantly in the past deserves a praise; please do not > consider it a burden.
Yes, I understood that when I read the text which is why I wrote "fair" and not "obliged" or "owe" in my reply. :-) > The only thing I ask in such situation is a notice, so that we can > plan effectively. This is essentially the reason why I sent my reply. It is human nature, after all, to wonder about a missing person.
