Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> writes: > "J.D. Smith" <[email protected]> writes: > >>> I am confused. How can they be hidden if org-hide-emphasis-markers is >>> nil by default? >> >> I see. Pushed a commit to avoid enabling emphasized text when that >> isn't configured. > > I am not sure if throwing an error is the best idea. > What if org-hide-emphasis-markers or org-link-descriptive change while > org-inside-mode is active?
Switched to a simple message. >>> Fair. I think that the main problem is that I now prefer something more >>> subtle than secondary-selection :) >> >> I wish there were some "subtle selection" face. What about an underline >> the color of secondary-selection background? Could blend the secondary >> selection 50% into the background color. It would have to be updated on >> `after-enable-theme-hook'. > > We may be going to far here. Dynamic faces are a complication, that may > cause issues for theme writers. Yeah. Is there anything else obvious in the default or org face set? I mean we could just treat it as a new org face for theme authors to target. We really need richer default face coverage.
