Hi Ihor,
Thank you for asking.
I used an LLM as a learning aid during development, for example, to
better understand some concepts, break down documentation, and discuss
implementation ideas. I wrote the patch myself.
I'll leave it to you to determine whether that falls within the scope of
the current GNU interim policy.
Best regards,
Abe
On 8/8/26 1:56 PM, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Abe <[email protected]> writes:
Subject: [PATCH] lisp, testing, etc: Fix #+FILETAGS review issues in
org-set-tags-command
Ihor Radchenko reviewed the initial '#+FILETAGS' patch and found four
issues by manual testing...
Before we proceed, could you please let me know if you used LLM to
produce the patch?
Org mode currently does not accept LLM contributions, as per interim GNU
policy active while GNU is assessing legal implications of LLM-generated
code on GPL.