Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> writes: > Daniel Mendler <[email protected]> writes: > >> Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> As for package-list, alas, Org will fail on it. I have been working to >>> address linter issues, but there are too many to make CI useful. >> >> I assume the main problem is that package-lint itself will know about >> Org functions, since Org is part of core. > > No. The problem is that many Org sources have genuine violations of code > standards. Many Org files won't pass even M-x checkdoc. > The problems are too numerous and must be solved before any kind of > linting is integrated into CI pipelines.
I see. What I meant is that this is not a fundamental problem which prevents using the linter later on. These numerous problems are of course painful and tedious to fix, and maybe even prohibitive since time is better invested elsewhere. Still, the file stdlib-changes in package-lint can be a useful source if you want to check the Emacs version when a symbol was added to Emacs or removed from it. Daniel
