> I must be dreaming... I am *sure* that, until yesterday or today, I > have always used C-c C-x C-b to insert a checkbox if none were > present; at least, that's what my fingers tell me and they have a > better memory than my head... I have always used C-c C-c to actually > mark or unmark the checkbox. Have the default bindings changed?
I remember now. When I rewrote org-toggle-checkbox, I followed closely its docstring. Thus, the default bindings changed because they weren't on par with documentation. > In any case, apologies for the noise but maybe I can suggest a > change to the default? C-c C-c already does an excellent job of > checking/unchecking a checkbox so it would be nice if C-c C-x C-b > would do as I thought it did: insert a checkbox if not present. Is > this a reasonable or desirable behaviour? C-c C-x C-b is more specific than C-c C-c. When used on an headline, it checks/unchecks all the items in the subtree. When used with a region active, it should checks/unchecks all items inside it. About the last point, I just noticed it isn't working as expected at the moment, but I have a patch for it. Regards, -- Nicolas _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
