Richard Riley <rile...@gmail.com> writes: > Eric S Fraga <ucec...@ucl.ac.uk> writes: > >> On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:51:16 -0700, Dan Davison <davi...@stats.ox.ac.uk> >> wrote: >>> >>> I've just pushed changes which mean that Org now fontifies code in code >>> blocks. Currently, this is turned on by default, so it would be helpful >>> if people could report any problems, and opinions as to whether it >>> should be on or off by default. >> >> [...] >> >> This is brilliant! Works very well on my notebook (with small code >> blocks as that's all I tend to have). Many thanks! > > Without wanting to rock the boat I think its safer to have this disabled > by default. I cant tell you how many times I thought I was in the LISP > buffer and ended up making a mess since this enhancement was added.
Hi Richard, I'm not quite clear what problems are arising from Org buffer edits. Could you expand? Thanks, Dan > I realise I can configure it myself but possibly the more conservative > "stick with old default" is better? It IS a nice feature when in more > capable hands than mine ;) What next? nxhtml integration and live > editing inside the src blocks? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
