Dan Davison <davi...@stats.ox.ac.uk> writes:

> Richard Riley <rile...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Eric S Fraga <ucec...@ucl.ac.uk> writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:51:16 -0700, Dan Davison <davi...@stats.ox.ac.uk> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I've just pushed changes which mean that Org now fontifies code in code
>>>> blocks. Currently, this is turned on by default, so it would be helpful
>>>> if people could report any problems, and opinions as to whether it
>>>> should be on or off by default.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> This is brilliant!  Works very well on my notebook (with small code
>>> blocks as that's all I tend to have).  Many thanks!
>>
>> Without wanting to rock the boat I think its safer to have this disabled
>> by default. I cant tell you how many times I thought I was in the LISP
>> buffer and ended up making a mess since this enhancement was added.
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> I'm not quite clear what problems are arising from Org buffer
> edits. Could you expand?

Nothing particularly harsh but I find myself reaching for elisp hot keys
and expecting indentation etc to work. It's no big deal and as I said I
can config it to revert to the old behaviour. Probably best to forget my
suggestion of leaving the default as no fontification ;)


-- 
☘ http://www.shamrockirishbar.com, http://www.richardriley.net

"Learning French is trivial: the word for horse is 'cheval' and
 everything follows thusly."


_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Reply via email to