Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> writes:
> The bug has been fixed, so the following is moot.
>
> Ah, but he didn't . :) Hence my question. :)
>
> I appreciated the effort to help, but I was wondering what he was
> trying to say, because he used strings instead of regexps and he used
> different settings for both variables. The bug was with regexps (i.e.
> {...}) and not strings.
>
I tried to reproduce it and I think I missed the regexp part. I am sorry
about that.
> In other words, he did not attempt to reproduce the bug, but instead
> changed 3 conditions back to a known-working state. It was not a
> surprise that it worked. :)
>
> But, again, I appreciated the effort to help.
>
> I was unable to type more than a few words at the time I asked. I
> hope this clarifies conclusively.
Your one liner reply to the mail confused me and I again typed in the
same thing. If you could have typed in the first paragraph in this mail
as your initial reply I could have tried with regexp.
Since now that Carsten has fixed the bug and it has not been ignored
because of my mistake, I think you are happy.
Thanks and Regards
Noorul
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
