ditto. same reason. In my mind the sig is like letterhead. Useful perhaps, but not really part of the message.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Sebastian Rose <sebastian_r...@gmx.de> wrote: > Łukasz Stelmach <lukasz.stelm...@iem.pw.edu.pl> writes: >> Hi. >> >> I am thinking about deploying org-footnote in message-mode. I'd like to >> use it for URLs most and I'd like to ask you a question. Where would you >> like to see the footnotes sections in my messages ;-) below or above the >> signature. Please consider that if they get below then they will be >> ripped off on reply. If, on the other hand I should put them above the >> signature then some hacking is required in the org-footnote-normalize >> function which of course is fun. > > > My vote is _above_. > > As you said: they will be ripped of on reply if placed below the > signature. > > Also, I expect the signature to be the last thing in a mail. I often do > not scroll down to see if something is below it. > > > Sebastian > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
