Jambunathan K <kjambunat...@gmail.com> writes: > I have every reason to believe that upcoming version of Org would be > tagged as 7.02. Earlier I had argued that version strings be > version-to-list compatible. I would like to reiterate it. > > My real concern is that 7.02 would be deemed as equivalent to 7.2 > internally by the versioning subsystem and this is likely to clash with > user's point of view. A user would *definitely* assume 7.02 as different > from 7.2 and in all probability swear that former is inferior to the > later. > > Please confirm what I am saying by evalling this: > > #+begin_src emacs-lisp > (version-list-= (version-to-list "7.02") (version-to-list "7.2")) > #+end_src
I confirm. > Ignore this mail if it is already taken care of. Needless to say, I have > ELPA-tarballs in mind when I say this. Another way is to make Emacs more liberal about version names. Can you suggest a new default for `version-regexp-alist' so that 7.01 is considered older than 7.10? (version-list-= (version-to-list "7.02") (version-to-list "7.2")) being t is not intuitive. -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
