Hi Jambunathan,
On Oct 28, 2010, at 2:40 PM, Jambunathan K wrote:
I have every reason to believe that upcoming version of Org would be
tagged as 7.02. Earlier I had argued that version strings be
version-to-list compatible. I would like to reiterate it.
My real concern is that 7.02 would be deemed as equivalent to 7.2
internally by the versioning subsystem and this is likely to clash
with
user's point of view. A user would *definitely* assume 7.02 as
different
from 7.2 and in all probability swear that former is inferior to the
later.
(version-to-list "7.02") -> (7 2)
(version-to-list "7.20") -> (7 20)
so it seems to me that if we keep two-digit numbers, there will be no
problem at all.
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(version-list-= (version-to-list "7.02") (version-to-list "7.20"))
#+end_src
- Carsten
Please confirm what I am saying by evalling this:
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(version-list-= (version-to-list "7.02") (version-to-list "7.2"))
#+end_src
Ignore this mail if it is already taken care of. Needless to say, I
have
ELPA-tarballs in mind when I say this.
Jambunathan K.
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
