"Andrew J. Korty" <a...@iu.edu> writes: tags seems to be:
- [babel] [1] or [Babel] - [PATCH] - [PATCH n/m] - [Accepted] : means "patch accepted". - Bug: - MobileOrg acronym tags[2]: [OT] [RFC] and so on [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2009-11/msg00212.html [2] http://www.gaarde.org/acronyms/ > Torsten Wagner <torsten.wag...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thinking of tags, I wonder why we use [Orgmode] since all mails >> coming from emacs-orgmode(a)gnu.org which is a strong indicator >> already. > > Not sure I agree with splitting the list, but the [Orgmode] tag is > definitely superfluous. Who has a mail client that can't filter on > the List-Id field? Come on! This is a standard for GNU project mailing lists: [gnugo-devel] Gnugo and CGoban [3] [coreutils] new snapshot available: coreutils-8.7.66-561f8 [4] I think it will never change. cheers, Giovanni [3] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnugo-devel/2010-12/index.html [4] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2010-12/index.html _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
