Hi Štěpán, Štěpán Němec <step...@gmail.com> writes:
> FWIW, I do. Having [Org] (or anything, really) prepended to the subjects > of _all_ mails coming from a list that is already uniquely identifiable > (e.g. by its address) has no information value altogether (unlike > [Babel], [PATCH] etc.) and only takes up the much precious Subject: > header space. Not that reducing the label from [Orgmode] to [Org] already seem to be a progress in the right direction :) Would you object having [Org] instead of [Orgmode]? > I have never understood why anyone would like anything like that. As Giovanni recalled, this is a standard GNU practice and I won't break it. Maybe this is a leftover from the time when most used email clients had no clever filters -- but maybe it's still useful for web archiving or other purposes I cannot think of right now. Cheers, -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
