>> >> My suggestion would be to go with Jason's css (combined with Eric's >> expandable table of contents) then have Eric's css and the old-worg >> css available as alternative css. >
Sounds good, I like the idea of combining the two styles. I don't know how alternate css stylesheets work, but I would say the more options the better. Which has the added benefit of keeping the option open of future css submissions from Orgers with more web-design experience. > > Sounds good. But first.. I noticed an issue with the expandable TOC on > a couple of pages: > > http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-eric/org-faq.html > http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-eric/org-glossary.html > > Does it have something to do with the javascript section-folding? > > By the way, having the javascript section-folding enabled on only some > pages is confusing and doesn't make for the best browsing experience. > Now that the TOC will be collapsed by default, perhaps it's no longer > needed? > Yes the javascript is probably the culprit here, I agree that with the hidden TOC it is probably not required. My preference would be to remove the section folding (and use of javascript) from Worg entirely. Cheers -- Eric > > Regards, > Jason _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
