Jason Dunsmore <emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com> writes: > "Eric Schulte" <schulte.e...@gmail.com> writes: > >>>> >>>> By the way, having the javascript section-folding enabled on only some >>>> pages is confusing and doesn't make for the best browsing experience. >>>> Now that the TOC will be collapsed by default, perhaps it's no longer >>>> needed? >>>> >>> >>> Yes the javascript is probably the culprit here, I agree that with the >>> hidden TOC it is probably not required. My preference would be to >>> remove the section folding (and use of javascript) from Worg entirely. >>> >> >> Is there a consensus on removing Javascript folding from *all* pages on >> Worg. I think this would be an improvement both for the readability and >> stylistic coherence of the site. > > I am in favor of removing the javascript folding from all Worg pages. > It would improve the consistency and experience of browsing Worg.
I made a version of the FAQ without the javascript folding: http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg/org-faq-nojs.html http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg/org-faq.html It like it better, but it's still a bit unwieldy. Maybe the FAQ just needs to be reorganized. See how Wikipedia does it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FAQ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FAQ_Index Matt or Bastien, do you have an opinion on reorganizing the FAQ? _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
