Eden Cardim <edencar...@gmail.com> writes:
> Tassilo> No, I just wasn't really sure what that SCAN argument
> Tassilo> means, so I tried to be as safe as possible. If it's
> Tassilo> always safe to provide nil, let's change that.
>
> Well, right now all it does is to check split rules against incoming
> mail. But, if we have a link to a message in org, then that message
> already went through the split process, so re-splitting is
> unnecessary.
Ok, so here we go:
>From 89fecc7b938385647618dc28c4df304df872e6eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tassilo Horn <tass...@member.fsf.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:27:54 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Call gnus-activate-group without SCAN arg.
* org-gnus.el (org-gnus-follow-link): Don't request scan of
group when following link.
---
lisp/org-gnus.el | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lisp/org-gnus.el b/lisp/org-gnus.el
index eba4cb4..a5ece8b 100644
--- a/lisp/org-gnus.el
+++ b/lisp/org-gnus.el
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ If `org-store-link' was called with a prefix arg the meaning of
(when article
(setq article (org-substring-no-properties article)))
(cond ((and group article)
- (gnus-activate-group group t)
+ (gnus-activate-group group)
(condition-case nil
(let* ((method (gnus-find-method-for-group group))
(backend (car method))
--
1.7.5.rc1
Bye,
Tassilo
