Patch 747 (http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/747/) is now "Accepted".
Maintainer comment: none This relates to the following submission: http://mid.gmane.org/%3C8762qjqqfy.fsf%40member.fsf.org%3E Here is the original message containing the patch: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Subject: [O] org-gnus-follow-link and nnimap-request-scan > Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 23:30:17 -0000 > From: Tassilo Horn <tass...@member.fsf.org> > X-Patchwork-Id: 747 > Message-Id: <8762qjqqfy....@member.fsf.org> > To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > > Eden Cardim <edencar...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Tassilo> No, I just wasn't really sure what that SCAN argument > > Tassilo> means, so I tried to be as safe as possible. If it's > > Tassilo> always safe to provide nil, let's change that. > > > > Well, right now all it does is to check split rules against incoming > > mail. But, if we have a link to a message in org, then that message > > already went through the split process, so re-splitting is > > unnecessary. > > Ok, so here we go: > Bye, > Tassilo > > > >From 89fecc7b938385647618dc28c4df304df872e6eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Tassilo Horn <tass...@member.fsf.org> > Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:27:54 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] Call gnus-activate-group without SCAN arg. > > * org-gnus.el (org-gnus-follow-link): Don't request scan of > group when following link. > --- > lisp/org-gnus.el | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lisp/org-gnus.el b/lisp/org-gnus.el > index eba4cb4..a5ece8b 100644 > --- a/lisp/org-gnus.el > +++ b/lisp/org-gnus.el > @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ If `org-store-link' was called with a prefix arg the > meaning of > (when article > (setq article (org-substring-no-properties article))) > (cond ((and group article) > - (gnus-activate-group group t) > + (gnus-activate-group group) > (condition-case nil > (let* ((method (gnus-find-method-for-group group)) > (backend (car method)) > -- > 1.7.5.rc1 > >