Hi Christian,
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:49, Christian Moe <m...@christianmoe.com> wrote:
> Nice! Tested only your snippet.
>
>
> * HTML: works!
>
> One question: As is, adjoining footnotes `2' and `3' read as `23'.
> Could/should the footnote export know to put a comma between them:`2,3'?
>
> For HTML purposes, I think not necessarily, the separator could be flexibly
> added with CSS like:
>
> : #+style: <style>sup + sup .footref:before {content: ", "}</style>
>From the point of view of semantics, it’d be better to separate them
in the content itself. For my part, I like Wikipedia’s ‘[1][2]’
style. ‘1, 2’ sounds even better to me, if it can be done.
Aankhen
