Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes:
> Correcting myself, I paste here another try to the problem at > hand. Indeed, moving an item to a list he doesn't directly belong to > makes little sense. Thus, the item will be moved at the end of its > list. Nice. Such a move could be bound to M-<up> when the cursor is on the first item, instead of throwing an error, as it does now. What do you think? -- Bastien
