Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: > On Jul 1, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Bastien wrote: > >> Hi Nicolas, >> >> Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> Correcting myself, I paste here another try to the problem at >>> hand. Indeed, moving an item to a list he doesn't directly belong to >>> makes little sense. Thus, the item will be moved at the end of its >>> list. >> >> Nice. Such a move could be bound to M-<up> when the cursor is on the >> first item, instead of throwing an error, as it does now. >> >> What do you think? > > This does sound counter-intuitive to me. > > - Carsten >
I agree but there *is* some precedence for this type of behaviour in Emacs: e.g. the bs buffer display package where moving up (<up>) at the top of the list of buffers takes you to the bottom of the list and vice versa (<down>)? -- : Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.50.1 : using Org-mode version 7.5 (release_7.5.533.gdffdb)
