Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sep 7, 2011, at 12:16 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote: > >> Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> writes: >> >>>> Why don't you just use a simple (perl/python/...) script to collect your >>>> data? Here's a quick hack in perl: >>> >>> That was my plan if I was not able to do from within Org. To me it would >>> be a lot faster than hacking something together in emacs-lisp, >>> unfortunately. >> >> If you insist on elisp, maybe something along these (untested) lines >> might work: >> >> ---8<--- cut here --- [snip] >> --- cut here --->8--- > > this is great!
Thank you :-) > Maybe we should make this a little builtin function, > with a format specification to create the lines. > What is still missing, I think, is some sorting by time would. > Basically, use > > (org-float-time > (apply 'encode-time (save-match-data (org-parse-time-string (match-string > 1))))) > > after the successful search for a clock string to get a floating > point number representing the starting time, collect the > line you are creating into an alist with the times and sort > them before inserting into the buffer. I don't know, wether adding small special purpose functions adds real value, since we already have "org-map-entries". Maybe adding generic functions to org or showing lisp snippets at worg would be more useful. Regards, Olaf