Daniel Bausch <danielbau...@gmx.de> writes: > Hi, > >> named code blocks [1] -- "source" "srcname" "function" >> calling external functions [2] -- "call" "lob" >> named data [3] -- "tblname" "resname" "results" "data" > > what about "#+name:" for [1] and [3], and "#+call:" for [2] ? > > That a table or list contains data is obvious. The only thing, the > additional > line is for, is to "name" it. That a source block contains source is also > obvious and is already noted by the use of #+begin_src, so why duplicate the > "src"-part? > > Daniel
I don't know if I've left it too late to vote on this but... I would go for "name" for [1] and [3] and "call" for [2]. I can, however, see the need for distinguishing between data tables and results so could be convinced that "data" and "results" should be used for [3]. In any case, I do know that I dislike srcname and tblname... -- : Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.90.1 : using Org-mode version 7.7 (release_7.7.452.g767f5)
