Daniel Bausch <danielbau...@gmx.de> writes:

> Hi,
>
>>          named code blocks [1] -- "source" "srcname" "function"
>> calling external functions [2] -- "call" "lob"
>>                 named data [3] -- "tblname" "resname" "results" "data"
>
> what about "#+name:" for [1] and [3], and "#+call:" for [2] ?
>
> That a table or list contains data is obvious.  The only thing, the 
> additional 
> line is for, is to "name" it.  That a source block contains source is also 
> obvious and is already noted by the use of #+begin_src, so why duplicate the 
> "src"-part?
>
> Daniel

I don't know if I've left it too late to vote on this but...

I would go for "name" for [1] and [3] and "call" for [2].

I can, however, see the need for distinguishing between data tables and
results so could be convinced that "data" and "results" should be used
for [3].  In any case, I do know that I dislike srcname and tblname...

-- 
: Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.90.1
: using Org-mode version 7.7 (release_7.7.452.g767f5)

Reply via email to