On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Sebastien Vauban <
wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> wrote:

> Hi Eric,
>
> (Due to a high "buzyness" level, I've been a bit out of the discussion for
> one
> week or so)
>
> Eric Schulte wrote:
> > The attached patch implements this latest "propname+" suggestion.  When
> > applied it results in the behavior shown below.
> >
> > I'm inclined to go with this as a solution moving forward.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > #+property: var    foo=1
> > #+property: var+ , bar=2
> > #+begin_src emacs-lisp
> >   (+ foo bar)
> > #+end_src
>
> So, in a way, adding the + after `var' is how you tell Org that this is an
> accumulated property?
>
> Two questions:
>
> 1. Why not the + after the property keyword (property+)? I guess because
> it's
>   more against other aspects of Org internals?  Anyway, putting + after the
>   var sounds as right to me -- maybe better even if we consider that you
>   declare var as accumulated, writing so.
>
> 2. Must there be a first `var' without `+'?  Accepted, tolerated or wrong?
>  I
>   mean, I'm sure that, due to heavy file editing, we'll sometimes have:
>

Might be a good idea to tolerate this.


>
>   #+property: var+   foo=1
>   #+property: var+ , bar=2
>   #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>     (+ foo bar)
>   #+end_src
>
> > #+results:
> > : 3
> >
> > #+begin_src emacs-lisp
> >   (org-entry-get (point) "var" t)
> > #+end_src
> >
> > #+results:
> > : foo=1, bar=2
> >
> > * overwriting a file-wide property
> >   :PROPERTIES:
> >   :var:      foo=7
> >   :END:
> >
> > #+begin_src emacs-lisp
> >   foo
> > #+end_src
> >
> > #+results:
> > : 7
> >
> > #+begin_src emacs-lisp
> >   (org-entry-get (point) "var" t)
> > #+end_src
> >
> > #+results:
> > : foo=7
> >
> > * appending to a file-wide property
> >   :PROPERTIES:
> >   :var+:      , baz=3
> >   :END:
>
> To be honest, the only thing that I dislike is the comma in the above line.
> Not intuitive at all. Quite hard to read.
>
> Can't the comma be implicitly added by the `+' after the property name?
>

On the one hand, it might have one additional advantage:

  #+property: var   foo="This is a very long text"
  #+property: var+ "with even more."

Would foo be:
"This is a very long text with even more"

Could one make the "," implicit, if the value follows the

x=y

style, while otherwise just concatenate the value to the one before?




> That would allow one to simply write:
>
>   * appending to a file-wide property
>     :PROPERTIES:
>     :var+:        baz=3
>     :END:
>
> and have the correct values.
>
> > #+begin_src emacs-lisp
> >   (+ foo bar baz)
> > #+end_src
> >
> > #+results:
> > : 6
> >
> > #+begin_src emacs-lisp
> >   (org-entry-get (point) "var" t)
> > #+end_src
> >
> > #+results:
> > : foo=1, bar=2, baz=3
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
>  Seb
>
> --
> Sebastien Vauban
>
>
>


-- 
Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology,
UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany)

Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
Stellenbosch University
South Africa

Tel :       +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44
Cell:       +33 - (0)6 85 62 59 98
Fax (F):       +33 - (0)9 58 10 27 44

Fax (D):    +49 - (0)3 21 21 25 22 44

email:      rai...@krugs.de

Skype:      RMkrug

Reply via email to