on Sat Feb 25 2012, David Maus <dmaus-AT-ictsoc.de> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > At Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:48:13 -1000, > Dave Abrahams wrote: >> >> [1 <text/plain (7bit)>] >> >> >> Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and >> what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See >> >> http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback >> >> Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list. >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> This function was misbehaving in a number of ways. The enclosed patch >> represents the changes necessary to make it work properly, accumulated >> over several weeks of testing. Sorry if the description is a bit vague. > > Thanks for the patch. I implemented the first to modifications (handle > org-last-indirect-buffer being nil and window-live-p > indirect-window).
Sorry, I can't parse that last sentence, and as a result I'm having trouble understanding the rest of the message. > These were indeed bugs or glitches. > > The third modification (set visibility according to property) is a new > feature. Currently org-tree-to-indirect buffer does not use the > VISIBILITY property but it makes sense to me to do so. > > I'll check this out and see to implement this. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
