on Sat Feb 25 2012, Dave Abrahams <dave-AT-boostpro.com> wrote: > on Sat Feb 25 2012, David Maus <dmaus-AT-ictsoc.de> wrote: > >> Hi Dave, >> >> At Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:48:13 -1000, >> Dave Abrahams wrote: >>> >>> [1 <text/plain (7bit)>] >>> >>> >>> Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and >>> what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See >>> >>> http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback >>> >>> Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list. >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> This function was misbehaving in a number of ways. The enclosed patch >>> represents the changes necessary to make it work properly, accumulated >>> over several weeks of testing. Sorry if the description is a bit vague. >> >> Thanks for the patch. I implemented the first to modifications (handle >> org-last-indirect-buffer being nil and window-live-p >> indirect-window). > > Sorry, I can't parse that last sentence, and as a result I'm having > trouble understanding the rest of the message. > >> These were indeed bugs or glitches. >> >> The third modification (set visibility according to property) is a new >> feature. Currently org-tree-to-indirect buffer does not use the >> VISIBILITY property but it makes sense to me to do so.
Well, new feature or not, org-tree-to-indirect-buffer stopped behaving correctly for me when it was added, and I had to make adjustments. >> I'll check this out and see to implement this. Thanks. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
