At Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:18:00 +0100, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Hello, > > David Maus <dm...@ictsoc.de> writes: > > > I don't see why we should drop the link type in fuzzy links. After all > > they /are/ are special type of link. > > There is no link type in fuzzy links : [[something]] matches > <<something>> in master. > > > Without the link type we will run into trouble, won't we?. > > > > In the example file: > > > > ,---- > > | We end the list at item [[itm:last]]. > > `---- > > > > So, itm:last is a fuzzy link but it could as well be a "regular" link > > of type "itm" with a path component of "last" and no description. > > I realize my examples are confusing. I shouldn't have used colons. In > fact, the output will be the same if the target is <<itm-last>>, > <<table-last>> or even <<foo>>. > > In other words, the "itm:" part wasn't meant as a link type, but as > a cosmetic part of the name. So the list example could as well be:
Thanks for the clarification. Best, -- David -- OpenPGP... 0x99ADB83B5A4478E6 Jabber.... dmj...@jabber.org Email..... dm...@ictsoc.de
pgpSeuw3JODk6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
