Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> writes: > Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> François Pinard <pin...@iro.umontreal.ca> writes: >> >> > I'm not sure I'm using "# <<tag>>" correctly, but my feeling is that it >> > should stick to the following text in various Org operations. Let's say >> > I have something like (as I think it): >> >> "# <<tag>>" is a deprecated construct. I suggest to avoid bothering with >> it. >> >> > > With all due respect, that is not a satisfactory answer. I, for one (or > for two: François would surely appreciate it too), would appreciate a > pointer to the deprecation notice (I don't remember seeing one but that > doesn't mean much), and a pointer (if different) to whatever construct > is supposed to replace it. > > Thanks, > Nick >
Isn't the deprecation the need to put the <<xxx>> in a comment (i.e. #)? The angle bracket syntax remains, I thought. But maybe I also am confused as to the current direction this is taking... -- : Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.1.50.1 : using Org release_7.8.09-529-g035ab3.dirty